|
Senate Votes and Positions
1. Drilling in the Arctic
I
In the far northeast corner of
Alaska lies one of America’s great natural treasures, the Arctic
National Wildlife Refuge. Its 19 million acres comprise what is
considered the crown jewel of America’s National Wildlife Refuge
System. Yet this truly undisturbed wilderness is in danger of being
destroyed.
This area is home to caribou, musk
oxen, grizzly bears, wolves, wolverines, foxes, golden eagles, snowy
owls, snow geese and millions of other birds, which earns it the
nickname of "America’s Serengeti." For a thousand
generations, the Gwich’in people of Northeast Alaska and Northwest
Canada have depended upon the Porcupine (River) caribou herd to
sustain their culture. The herd is central to their way of life,
providing food, clothing, and a critical link to their traditional
ways.
On April 6, 2000, Senators Pete
Domenici (R-NM) and Frank Murkowski (R-AK) attached a provision to
the 2001 fiscal year budget resolution that would have assumed $1.2
billion in revenue from oil leasing in the Arctic Refuge. Although
this provision was not binding, it would have provided the budgetary
justification for additional legislation to drill in the Arctic.
Senator William Roth (R-DE) brought a motion to the Senate floor to
remove the drilling provision. Senator Murkowski offered a motion to
end debate on the Roth amendment. The Murkowski motion passed 51 to
49. No is the pro-wilderness vote. (Roll call vote 58, 106th
Congress) The amendment was removed from the final budget document
during the House-Senate Conference.
2. Timber Sale Subsidy
According to the 2001 Green Scissors
report released by a coalition of environmental, taxpayer and
consumer groups, the U.S. Forest Service's timber program has
"created a legacy of waste and abuse, both fiscally and
environmentally." Between 1992 and 1998, the General Accounting
Office (GAO) documents that the Forest Service lost more than $2
billion in taxpayer money. The Forest Service used this money to
subsidize the timber industry’s logging and road building in our
national forests that has destroyed natural habitats and polluted
drinking water.
On July 18, 2000, Senators Richard
Bryan (D-NV) and Peter Fitzgerald (R-IL) offered an amendment to the
Interior Appropriations bill (H.R. 4578) to cut $30 million from the
timber sales budget. Half of the savings would have been used in
preparation for fighting wildfires in national forests. The
amendment failed 45 to 54. Yes is the pro-wilderness vote. (Roll
call vote 207, 106th Congress)
3. Development in National Monuments
The Antiquities Act, created in
1906, gives the President the ability to proclaim federal lands as
national monuments. These designations have occurred because areas
were threatened or there were opportunities and interest to protect
lands with unique qualities for future generations. The first
National Monument was created by President Theodore Roosevelt to
protect Devils Tower in Wyoming. Popular national parks that were
first protected as national monuments include Joshua Tree in
California, Grand Tetons in Wyoming, Grand Canyon in Arizona and
Denali in Alaska. President Clinton proclaimed 19 new national
monuments during his tenure, including Utah’s Grand Staircase-Escalante,
the Sequoias of California and the Sonoran Desert of Arizona.
On July 18, 2000, Senator Don
Nickles (R-OK) offered an amendment to the Interior Appropriations
bill (H.R. 4578) to prohibit funds from being used to establish or
expand a national monument, unless Congress also approved it. In
effect, this would have removed the President’s ability to
designate additional national monuments. The Senate rejected the
amendment 49 to 50. No is the pro-wilderness vote. (Roll call vote
208, 106th Congress)
4. Interior Secretary Nomination
The Interior Department’s mission
is to conserve, restore, and protect the country’s precious
natural and cultural heritage for future generations. The Secretary
of the Interior Department is the top ranking position in the
agency.
When Gale Norton was nominated by
the President to be Interior Secretary, the conservation community
unanimously opposed the nomination. Gale Norton has a long, clearly
defined history regarding her work and positions on the environment.
For example, Secretary Norton has a record of opposition to federal
land and wildlife stewardship and instead favors logging, drilling,
grazing and mining interests; she does not support a strong role for
federal enforcement of environmental laws; she endorsed eliminating
the Bureau of Land Management (an agency she now oversees), selling
off fish and wildlife refuges and transferring public lands to
private parties; and she believes taxpayers should pay the private
sector to comply with environmental laws.
Indeed, many of the concerns about
Norton’s prior experience are now a reality. As Secretary, she
advocates oil drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge,
supports weakening protections of national monuments, limits
opportunities for public involvement, and is rolling back
regulations to protect public land.
Secretary Norton is not only
advocating and defending positions shared by big business and the
extractive industries, but she is filling her high level staff
positions with representatives and lobbyists who formerly worked in
these areas. Secretary Norton’s second in command, J. Steven
Griles, is a former lobbyist for the coal and oil industries and
Camden Toohey, special assistant for Alaska, was Executive Director
of Arctic Power, the principal lobbyist for drilling in the Arctic
Refuge.
On January 30, 2001, the Senate
voted to nominate Gale Norton as Secretary of the Interior
Department. The nomination passed the Senate 75 to 24. No is the
pro-wilderness vote. (Roll Call vote 6, 107th Congress)
5. Funding National Monuments
The Antiquities Act of 1906 acts as
an important insurance policy that gives the president the power to
grant national monument status to areas possessing significant
historic, scenic, and / or scientific values. The Act has been used
by 17 U.S. Presidents to protect many of our nation’s treasured
places. President Clinton continued to build on this bipartisan
tradition by establishing 19 national monuments.
The Antiquities Act maintains
appropriate roles for both the president and Congress in the
protection of important federal land resources. It allows the
president to act quickly, and it also maintains Congress' ability to
also designate national monuments, change monument boundaries,
direct resources for monument management, re-designate monuments as
national parks, and even to abolish monuments.
On July 11, 2001, Senator Richard
Durbin (D-IL) introduced an amendment to the Interior Appropriations
bill (H.R. 2217) that would protect America’s national monuments.
The amendment prohibits federal land management agencies from
spending any money on activities related to oil and gas drilling and
coal mining in monuments for the next fiscal year, except where such
activities are already allowed. The amendment passed the Senate by a
voice vote after
an attempt to table the amendment
failed 42 to 57. No is the pro-wilderness vote. (Roll Call vote 229,
107th Congress)
6. Drilling in the Arctic
II
On April 16, 2002, Senator Frank
Murkowski
(R-AK) offered an amendment to the
Senate Energy bill (S. 517) to open the 1.5 million acre Coastal
Plain of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge to oil drilling.
Allowing oil drilling in the Refuge would create a spider web of
roads, pipelines, drill pads and other industrial scale development
in this pristine wilderness. The U.S. Geological Survey estimates
that there is only a six month supply of oil in the Arctic Refuge
and that would not be available for ten years.
A motion to end debate (known as a
cloture motion) was filed on the Murkowski amendment. Pro-drilling
Senators needed to garner 60 votes in order to end debate and pass
the Murkowski amendment. Pro-wilderness Senators opposed the
procedural motion. The Murkowski amendment included the House
language (see Drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge 1 on
page 16) and ancillary positions designed to attract votes. On April
18th, 2002, the Senate defeated the cloture motion by a vote of
46-54, 14 votes short of the 60 required. The final Energy bill
passed in the Senate did not include drilling in the Arctic Refuge.
No is the pro-wilderness vote. (Roll call vote 71, 107th Congress)
7. Arctic National Wildlife Refuge
Senator Joseph Lieberman (D-CT) is
the sponsor of legislation to protect a portion of the Arctic
National Wildlife Refuge as wilderness, S.411. The U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service considers the 1.5 million-acre Coastal Plain area
to be the "biological heart" of the entire 19-million acre
refuge. This area -- where the oil industry wants to drill -- is the
center of wildlife activity in the Arctic Refuge and its most
productive area. Most years, it is the place where greater than
100,000 caribou gather to give birth and raise their young. The
Coastal Plain is a critical part of our nation's preeminent
wilderness.
Nestled between the jagged peaks of
the Brooks Range and the shores of the Arctic Ocean, the Coastal
Plain -- just five percent of Alaska’s North Slope -- is the only
fragment of America’s arctic coastline not already opened to oil
exploration or drilling. The United States Geological Survey
scientists estimate that there is only enough oil under the Arctic
Refuge to supply America’s energy needs for six months. And the
oil companies themselves admit that the oil would not be available
for at least ten years. Co-sponsoring legislation to protect the
Arctic National Wildlife Refuge is the pro-wilderness position.
8. America’s Red Rock Wilderness
Senator Richard Durbin (D-IL) is the
sponsor of America’s Red Rock Wilderness Act of 2001, S. 786. This
bill would protect more than nine million acres of federal public
lands in Utah. The publicly owned wild places of Utah, managed by
the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), are world-renowned for their
spectacular beauty, with deep, narrow red rock canyons, fantastic
sandstone arches, tremendous open vistas, and wild rivers. Utah’s
BLM wildlands provide homes to at least two dozen endangered or
sensitive wildlife species, including the desert bighorn sheep,
cougar, peregrine falcon, and the endangered desert tortoise and
Bonneville cutthroat trout. They also protect some of the richest
concentrations of prehistoric ruins in the world – left by America’s
ancient Anasazi and other cultures. Co-sponsoring legislation to
protect America’s Red Rock Wilderness is the pro-wilderness
position.
|